No search within music services in 4.0.2 for Windows?

Comments

4 comments

  • Official comment
    William Heck

    Thanks @Beedum you have answered my question! That's exactly the search that I was talking about, but I did not see that the field below Search (the one that shows TuneIn on the screen shot) was a drop-down. My mistake!

    One thing that I did notice on retesting: searches sometimes seem a little funky. For example, with Qobuz specified for the service to search, looking for "buxtehude trio sonatas" and "buxtehude trio" returned "No Content Found", but performing exactly the same searches on the Qobuz web player (play.qobuz.com) returned appropriate albums and tracks. Similarly, searching for "rachmaninoff isle of the dead" returned a "No Content" message but searching for "rachmaninoff" worked. In fact, another search for "rachmaninoff isle of the dead" confused BluOS so badly that it decided that it could not find the player, even though the app on my phone could. Restarting Windows eventually fixed that.

    Hopefully these kinds of sneaky bugs will be ironed out over the next few weeks.

     

  • Beedu

    Not sure if I understood everything correctly. But did you select your music service below the search field?

    Search for Qobuz works fine for me. Search in local library doesn't work with windows controller 4.0.0.

    0
  • Brian
    Lossless

    I too have an issue with search as it's currently implemented. For example a search in Qobuz for "Cowboy Junkies" returns a list of songs, then playlists, then albums in no particular order, then artist hidden below the bottom of the screen requiring scrolling. Why isn't the artist prioritized and placed at the top?

    Searching the local library is broken and returns no results.

     

     

    0
  • Tony W.
    Product Support Manager

    Hey Brian

    We are seeing odd results in the Desktop App and our Product Development Team is investigating. Look for a fix to this very shortly. Other App platforms should be good in the in terim.

    We do apologise for the inconvenience. 

    0

Please sign in to leave a comment.